Is this how we arrived at this point in time in the climate change issue?

It is so obvious that evidence alarmists rely on is tainted and biased IMO. Their complete unwillingness to look objectively at that is revealing. It demonstrates that they have a faith driven belief system. If something goes against their belief system they easily discount it. David b claims to be a biologist but apparently discounts all stomata proxy data because he prefers to believe that ice that often takes a thousand years to form is a more precise proxy of CO2. I don't like guessing what other people, particularly alarmists, think because I don'tknow. I just see what they seem to ignore and that is mountains of contradictory evidence.